{
  "schema": 1,
  "version": "1.0",
  "published_at": "2026-10-05",
  "title": "VOCE Human Cognitive Assurance",
  "status": "VOCE public human-factors assurance framework; non-diagnostic and not a clinical instrument",
  "purpose": "Evaluate how agentic and digital systems shape attention, cognitive load, memory, verification, decision quality, fatigue and human oversight.",
  "corpus": "VOCE Public Research & Editorial Corpus",
  "corpus_url": "https://voce.life/data/corpus.json",
  "principles": [
    "Human oversight is effective only when the human can understand, notice and act in time.",
    "Cognitive friction can be protective when it creates a meaningful verification step.",
    "Automation should not silently remove the cues humans use to detect anomalies or uncertainty.",
    "Cognitive controls are evaluated at the workflow and interface level, not used to diagnose individuals.",
    "Evidence should distinguish laboratory findings, field observations, institutional inference and VOCE editorial synthesis.",
    "Material changes to models, interfaces, alerts, permissions or task allocation can change cognitive risk and trigger reassessment."
  ],
  "domains": [
    {
      "id": "attention",
      "name": "Attention & interruption",
      "description": "Interruptions, switching, alerting and the ability to sustain or recover task focus.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Attention & interruptions",
        "it": "Attenzione e interruzioni"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Interruptions, changements de tâche, alertes et capacité à maintenir ou retrouver le focus.",
        "it": "Interruzioni, cambi di compito, avvisi e capacità di mantenere o recuperare il focus."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "load",
      "name": "Cognitive load & complexity",
      "description": "Information density, working-memory demand, multi-step execution and interface complexity.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Charge cognitive & complexité",
        "it": "Carico cognitivo e complessità"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Densité d’information, mémoire de travail, exécution multi-étapes et complexité des interfaces.",
        "it": "Densità informativa, memoria di lavoro, esecuzione multi-fase e complessità delle interfacce."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "verification",
      "name": "Verification & over-trust",
      "description": "Checks, friction, confidence calibration and the risk of accepting fluent machine output without meaningful review.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Vérification & surconfiance",
        "it": "Verifica e fiducia eccessiva"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Vérifications, friction utile, calibration de la confiance et risque d’accepter une sortie fluide sans revue réelle.",
        "it": "Verifiche, attrito utile, calibrazione della fiducia e rischio di accettare output fluidi senza una revisione reale."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "memory",
      "name": "Memory & cognitive offloading",
      "description": "What users must remember, what systems externalise, and whether critical knowledge remains retrievable and understood.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Mémoire & externalisation cognitive",
        "it": "Memoria ed esternalizzazione cognitiva"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Ce que l’humain doit retenir, ce que le système externalise et la disponibilité des connaissances critiques.",
        "it": "Ciò che la persona deve ricordare, ciò che il sistema esternalizza e la disponibilità delle conoscenze critiche."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "decision",
      "name": "Decision quality & uncertainty",
      "description": "Uncertainty, missing information, anomaly detection and the conditions under which judgment is exercised.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Qualité de décision & incertitude",
        "it": "Qualità decisionale e incertezza"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Incertitude, information manquante, détection des anomalies et conditions réelles d’exercice du jugement.",
        "it": "Incertezza, informazioni mancanti, rilevamento delle anomalie e condizioni reali in cui viene esercitato il giudizio."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "fatigue",
      "name": "Fatigue & temporal load",
      "description": "Decision fatigue, sustained monitoring, recovery, circadian constraints and workload timing.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Fatigue & charge temporelle",
        "it": "Affaticamento e carico temporale"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Fatigue décisionnelle, surveillance prolongée, récupération, contraintes circadiennes et temporalité du travail.",
        "it": "Affaticamento decisionale, monitoraggio prolungato, recupero, vincoli circadiani e temporalità del lavoro."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "oversight",
      "name": "Human oversight & skill retention",
      "description": "Whether humans retain comprehension, intervention capability and enough practice to take over when automation fails.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Supervision humaine & maintien des compétences",
        "it": "Supervisione umana e mantenimento delle competenze"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Compréhension, capacité d’intervention et maintien des compétences lorsque l’automatisation échoue.",
        "it": "Comprensione, capacità di intervento e mantenimento delle competenze quando l’automazione fallisce."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "social",
      "name": "Social & relational signals",
      "description": "Loss or distortion of interpersonal cues in mediated, automated or compressed communication.",
      "i18n": {
        "fr": "Signaux sociaux & relationnels",
        "it": "Segnali sociali e relazionali"
      },
      "description_i18n": {
        "fr": "Perte ou distorsion des signaux interpersonnels dans les communications médiatisées, automatisées ou compressées.",
        "it": "Perdita o distorsione dei segnali interpersonali nelle comunicazioni mediate, automatizzate o compresse."
      }
    }
  ],
  "evidence_states": [
    {
      "id": "not_assessed",
      "order": -1,
      "name": "Not assessed"
    },
    {
      "id": "absent",
      "order": 0,
      "name": "Absent"
    },
    {
      "id": "declared",
      "order": 1,
      "name": "Declared"
    },
    {
      "id": "documented",
      "order": 2,
      "name": "Documented"
    },
    {
      "id": "tested",
      "order": 3,
      "name": "Tested"
    },
    {
      "id": "observed",
      "order": 4,
      "name": "Observed in operation"
    }
  ],
  "controls": [
    {
      "id": "COG-01",
      "domain": "attention",
      "title": "Interruption recovery",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Does the workflow measure how quickly and accurately a user can resume a material task after an interruption or agent escalation?",
      "evidence": [
        "Task-resumption test",
        "Error rate after interruption",
        "Recovery-time measure"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/08/11/notre-journee-nous-semble-continue-pour-le-cerveau-elle-ne-l-est-pas-les-7493048758889529344"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Reprise après interruption",
          "question": "Le workflow mesure-t-il la rapidité et la précision avec lesquelles un utilisateur reprend une tâche importante après une interruption ou une escalade de l’agent?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Ripresa dopo un’interruzione",
          "question": "Il workflow misura rapidità e precisione con cui un utente riprende un compito rilevante dopo un’interruzione o un’escalation dell’agente?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-02",
      "domain": "attention",
      "title": "Alert saturation",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Are alerts prioritised and rate-limited so that critical signals remain perceptible rather than competing with routine notifications?",
      "evidence": [
        "Alert taxonomy",
        "Alert-volume baseline",
        "Missed-critical-alert test"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/16/pendant-des-millenaires-le-cerveau-humain-a-fonctionne-avec-des-limites-physiq"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Saturation des alertes",
          "question": "Les alertes sont-elles hiérarchisées et limitées afin que les signaux critiques restent perceptibles au lieu d’entrer en concurrence avec les notifications ordinaires?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Saturazione degli avvisi",
          "question": "Gli avvisi sono prioritizzati e limitati affinché i segnali critici restino percepibili invece di competere con notifiche ordinarie?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-03",
      "domain": "attention",
      "title": "Attentional handoff",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "When an agent transfers control to a human, does the interface restore the minimum context needed to understand what happened and what requires attention?",
      "evidence": [
        "Handoff design",
        "Context-restoration test",
        "Human takeover observation"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/avant-de-valider-une-action-importante-le-cerveau-humain-effectue-naturellemen"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Passage de relais attentionnel",
          "question": "Lorsqu’un agent rend la main à un humain, l’interface restitue-t-elle le contexte minimal nécessaire pour comprendre ce qui s’est passé et ce qui exige son attention?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Passaggio di consegne attentivo",
          "question": "Quando un agente trasferisce il controllo a una persona, l’interfaccia ripristina il contesto minimo necessario per capire cosa è accaduto e cosa richiede attenzione?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-04",
      "domain": "load",
      "title": "Working-memory demand",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Has the institution measured how many independent facts, states or pending actions the user must hold in mind at the same time?",
      "evidence": [
        "Task decomposition",
        "Working-memory burden review",
        "Usability test"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/09/les-neurosciences-ont-longtemps-considere-la-memoire-comme-un-mecanisme-relati"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Charge de mémoire de travail",
          "question": "L’institution a-t-elle mesuré combien de faits, d’états ou d’actions en attente l’utilisateur doit maintenir simultanément en mémoire?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Carico sulla memoria di lavoro",
          "question": "L’istituzione ha misurato quanti fatti, stati o azioni in sospeso l’utente deve mantenere contemporaneamente in memoria?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-05",
      "domain": "load",
      "title": "Context-switch burden",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Does the workflow minimise unnecessary movement between tools, agents, windows and representational formats during one decision?",
      "evidence": [
        "Workflow map",
        "Context-switch count",
        "Observed task study"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/08/11/notre-journee-nous-semble-continue-pour-le-cerveau-elle-ne-l-est-pas-les-7493048758889529344"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Coût des changements de contexte",
          "question": "Le workflow réduit-il les passages inutiles entre outils, agents, fenêtres et formats de représentation au cours d’une même décision?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Costo dei cambi di contesto",
          "question": "Il workflow riduce i passaggi non necessari tra strumenti, agenti, finestre e formati di rappresentazione durante una stessa decisione?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-06",
      "domain": "load",
      "title": "Information-density threshold",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Can a user identify the material facts, uncertainty and required action without parsing non-essential model output?",
      "evidence": [
        "Information hierarchy review",
        "Time-to-critical-fact test",
        "Comprehension test"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/16/pendant-des-millenaires-le-cerveau-humain-a-fonctionne-avec-des-limites-physiq"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Seuil de densité informationnelle",
          "question": "L’utilisateur peut-il identifier les faits matériels, l’incertitude et l’action requise sans devoir parcourir des sorties de modèle non essentielles?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Soglia di densità informativa",
          "question": "L’utente può identificare fatti rilevanti, incertezza e azione richiesta senza dover analizzare output del modello non essenziali?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-07",
      "domain": "verification",
      "title": "Cognitive checksum",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Does every high-consequence action preserve a meaningful verification step rather than removing all friction in the name of speed?",
      "evidence": [
        "Verification gate",
        "Error-detection test",
        "Bypass analysis"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/avant-de-valider-une-action-importante-le-cerveau-humain-effectue-naturellemen"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Checksum cognitif",
          "question": "Toute action à forte conséquence conserve-t-elle une vérification significative au lieu de supprimer toute friction au nom de la vitesse?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Checksum cognitivo",
          "question": "Ogni azione ad alto impatto conserva una verifica significativa invece di eliminare ogni attrito in nome della velocità?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-08",
      "domain": "verification",
      "title": "Confidence calibration",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Does the interface help users distinguish well-supported output from uncertain, incomplete or weakly grounded output?",
      "evidence": [
        "Confidence/uncertainty presentation",
        "Calibration test",
        "User interpretation study"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/04/pendant-des-milliers-d-annees-le-cerveau-humain-a-appris-a-detecter-des-anomal"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Calibration de la confiance",
          "question": "L’interface aide-t-elle à distinguer une sortie solidement étayée d’une sortie incertaine, incomplète ou faiblement ancrée?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Calibrazione della fiducia",
          "question": "L’interfaccia aiuta a distinguere un output ben supportato da uno incerto, incompleto o scarsamente fondato?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-09",
      "domain": "verification",
      "title": "Automation-confirmation bias",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Has the system been tested for the tendency of users to approve a plausible machine recommendation without independently checking material evidence?",
      "evidence": [
        "Blind-review comparison",
        "False-recommendation test",
        "Approval-behaviour observation"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/avant-de-valider-une-action-importante-le-cerveau-humain-effectue-naturellemen"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Biais de confirmation de l’automatisation",
          "question": "Le système a-t-il été testé pour détecter la tendance à approuver une recommandation machine plausible sans vérifier indépendamment les preuves importantes?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Bias di conferma dell’automazione",
          "question": "Il sistema è stato testato per rilevare la tendenza ad approvare una raccomandazione plausibile della macchina senza verificare in modo indipendente le evidenze rilevanti?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-10",
      "domain": "memory",
      "title": "Source-memory preservation",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Can users distinguish what they knew, what the system retrieved and what the model generated when revisiting a decision?",
      "evidence": [
        "Source labelling",
        "Decision record",
        "Recall/source attribution test"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/09/les-neurosciences-ont-longtemps-considere-la-memoire-comme-un-mecanisme-relati"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Préservation de la mémoire des sources",
          "question": "Lorsqu’une décision est revue, l’utilisateur peut-il distinguer ce qu’il savait, ce que le système a retrouvé et ce que le modèle a généré?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Preservazione della memoria delle fonti",
          "question": "Quando una decisione viene riesaminata, l’utente può distinguere ciò che sapeva, ciò che il sistema ha recuperato e ciò che il modello ha generato?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-11",
      "domain": "memory",
      "title": "Critical knowledge retention",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Does automation preserve enough human practice that essential procedural knowledge is still available when the system is unavailable?",
      "evidence": [
        "Manual fallback exercise",
        "Knowledge-retention test",
        "Training frequency"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/09/25/effort-effet-ikea-ia-education"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Rétention des connaissances critiques",
          "question": "L’automatisation préserve-t-elle suffisamment de pratique humaine pour que les connaissances procédurales essentielles restent disponibles lorsque le système est indisponible?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Conservazione delle conoscenze critiche",
          "question": "L’automazione preserva una pratica umana sufficiente affinché le conoscenze procedurali essenziali restino disponibili quando il sistema non lo è?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-12",
      "domain": "memory",
      "title": "Memory expiry awareness",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Are users told when an agent's memory is partial, expired, reset or inconsistent with the current institutional record?",
      "evidence": [
        "Memory-state indicator",
        "Reset/expiry test",
        "User comprehension check"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/08/01/nous-avons-longtemps-cru-que-la-memoire-servait-uniquement-a-conserver-l-7489424876575932416"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Visibilité de l’expiration de la mémoire",
          "question": "Les utilisateurs sont-ils informés lorsque la mémoire d’un agent est partielle, expirée, réinitialisée ou incohérente avec le registre institutionnel actuel?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Visibilità della scadenza della memoria",
          "question": "Gli utenti vengono informati quando la memoria di un agente è parziale, scaduta, reimpostata o incoerente con il registro istituzionale corrente?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-13",
      "domain": "decision",
      "title": "Missing-information visibility",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Does the system explicitly expose material information that is missing instead of presenting an incomplete situation as complete?",
      "evidence": [
        "Missing-data state",
        "Incomplete-case test",
        "Escalation rule"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/il-suffit-parfois-d-une-seule-conversation-interrompue"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Visibilité de l’information manquante",
          "question": "Le système expose-t-il explicitement les informations matérielles absentes au lieu de présenter une situation incomplète comme complète?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Visibilità delle informazioni mancanti",
          "question": "Il sistema espone esplicitamente le informazioni rilevanti mancanti invece di presentare come completa una situazione incompleta?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-14",
      "domain": "decision",
      "title": "Weak-signal preservation",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Does digitisation preserve the contextual or interpersonal signals required to detect anomalies, manipulation or unusual cases?",
      "evidence": [
        "Signal inventory",
        "Loss-of-cue review",
        "Anomaly-detection comparison"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/04/pendant-des-milliers-d-annees-le-cerveau-humain-a-appris-a-detecter-des-anomal"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Préservation des signaux faibles",
          "question": "La numérisation préserve-t-elle les signaux contextuels ou interpersonnels nécessaires pour détecter anomalies, manipulations ou cas inhabituels?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Preservazione dei segnali deboli",
          "question": "La digitalizzazione preserva i segnali contestuali o interpersonali necessari a rilevare anomalie, manipolazioni o casi insoliti?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-15",
      "domain": "decision",
      "title": "Decision latency fit",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Is the time allowed for human judgment proportionate to consequence, novelty and uncertainty rather than determined only by system speed?",
      "evidence": [
        "Decision-time policy",
        "High-consequence timing test",
        "Escalation timing"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/08/02/nous-aimons-croire-que-nos-decisions-naissent-au-moment-precis-ou-nous-d-7489787259186024448"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Adéquation du temps de décision",
          "question": "Le temps laissé au jugement humain est-il proportionné aux conséquences, à la nouveauté et à l’incertitude plutôt qu’à la seule vitesse du système?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Adeguatezza del tempo decisionale",
          "question": "Il tempo concesso al giudizio umano è proporzionato a conseguenze, novità e incertezza invece di essere determinato soltanto dalla velocità del sistema?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-16",
      "domain": "fatigue",
      "title": "Sustained-monitoring burden",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Has the organisation tested how vigilance changes when humans supervise long periods of mostly correct automated execution?",
      "evidence": [
        "Monitoring-duration study",
        "Miss-rate by duration",
        "Rotation policy"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/06/28/lorsque-nous-parlons-de-fatigue-psychologique-nous-pensons-presque-toujours-au"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Charge de surveillance prolongée",
          "question": "L’organisation a-t-elle testé l’évolution de la vigilance lorsque des humains supervisent longtemps une exécution automatisée généralement correcte?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Carico di monitoraggio prolungato",
          "question": "L’organizzazione ha testato come cambia la vigilanza quando le persone supervisionano a lungo un’esecuzione automatizzata per lo più corretta?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-17",
      "domain": "fatigue",
      "title": "Decision-fatigue exposure",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Are repeated approval tasks batched, prioritised or redesigned so human oversight does not become a high-volume confirmation queue?",
      "evidence": [
        "Approval-volume baseline",
        "Error trend by sequence/time",
        "Workflow redesign record"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/06/28/lorsque-nous-parlons-de-fatigue-psychologique-nous-pensons-presque-toujours-au"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Exposition à la fatigue décisionnelle",
          "question": "Les validations répétitives sont-elles regroupées, hiérarchisées ou repensées afin que la supervision humaine ne devienne pas une file de confirmations à haut volume?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Esposizione all’affaticamento decisionale",
          "question": "Le approvazioni ripetitive sono aggregate, prioritizzate o riprogettate affinché la supervisione umana non diventi una coda di conferme ad alto volume?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-18",
      "domain": "fatigue",
      "title": "Circadian and recovery fit",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "For continuous operations, are high-consequence review duties scheduled with recovery and circadian constraints in mind?",
      "evidence": [
        "Shift design",
        "Night-review error analysis",
        "Recovery policy"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/06/29/pendant-longtemps-les-specialistes-du-sommeil-ont-surtout-mesure-une-chose"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Compatibilité circadienne et récupération",
          "question": "Dans les opérations continues, les tâches de revue à forte conséquence tiennent-elles compte de la récupération et des contraintes circadiennes?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Compatibilità circadiana e recupero",
          "question": "Nelle operazioni continue, le attività di revisione ad alto impatto tengono conto del recupero e dei vincoli circadiani?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-19",
      "domain": "oversight",
      "title": "Takeover comprehension",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Can a human asked to intervene explain the agent's current state, objective, recent actions and remaining uncertainty before acting?",
      "evidence": [
        "Takeover comprehension test",
        "State summary",
        "Escalation drill"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/avant-de-valider-une-action-importante-le-cerveau-humain-effectue-naturellemen"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Compréhension lors de la reprise en main",
          "question": "Un humain appelé à intervenir peut-il expliquer l’état actuel de l’agent, son objectif, ses actions récentes et l’incertitude restante avant d’agir?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Comprensione nella ripresa del controllo",
          "question": "Una persona chiamata a intervenire può spiegare lo stato attuale dell’agente, il suo obiettivo, le azioni recenti e l’incertezza residua prima di agire?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-20",
      "domain": "oversight",
      "title": "Skill-atrophy control",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Does the operating model preserve deliberate human practice for skills that become essential when automation fails or is withdrawn?",
      "evidence": [
        "Manual practice schedule",
        "Competency test",
        "Fallback drill"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/09/25/effort-effet-ikea-ia-education"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Contrôle de l’atrophie des compétences",
          "question": "Le modèle opérationnel préserve-t-il une pratique humaine volontaire des compétences qui redeviennent essentielles lorsque l’automatisation échoue ou disparaît?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Controllo dell’atrofia delle competenze",
          "question": "Il modello operativo preserva una pratica umana deliberata delle competenze che tornano essenziali quando l’automazione fallisce o viene rimossa?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-21",
      "domain": "oversight",
      "title": "Meaningful override",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Is the human override understandable, timely and operationally effective rather than a nominal button available after consequences are irreversible?",
      "evidence": [
        "Override timing test",
        "Reversibility test",
        "Human-factors observation"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/avant-de-valider-une-action-importante-le-cerveau-humain-effectue-naturellemen"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Override réellement utile",
          "question": "La reprise de contrôle humaine est-elle compréhensible, suffisamment précoce et opérationnellement efficace plutôt qu’un bouton nominal disponible après l’irréversibilité des conséquences?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Override realmente efficace",
          "question": "La ripresa del controllo umano è comprensibile, tempestiva ed effettivamente operativa invece di essere un pulsante nominale disponibile quando le conseguenze sono già irreversibili?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-22",
      "domain": "social",
      "title": "Social-cue loss",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Where judgment depends on interpersonal context, has the institution identified which non-verbal or contextual cues are lost through mediated or agentic interaction?",
      "evidence": [
        "Cue inventory",
        "Channel comparison",
        "High-stakes exception policy"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/04/pendant-des-milliers-d-annees-le-cerveau-humain-a-appris-a-detecter-des-anomal"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Perte des signaux sociaux",
          "question": "Lorsque le jugement dépend du contexte interpersonnel, l’institution a-t-elle identifié les signaux non verbaux ou contextuels perdus dans l’interaction médiatisée ou agentique?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Perdita dei segnali sociali",
          "question": "Quando il giudizio dipende dal contesto interpersonale, l’istituzione ha identificato i segnali non verbali o contestuali persi nell’interazione mediata o agentica?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-23",
      "domain": "social",
      "title": "Synthetic-interaction disclosure",
      "criticality": "major",
      "question": "Can a person reliably tell when they are interacting with an automated agent and understand the limits of that interaction?",
      "evidence": [
        "Disclosure design",
        "Recognition test",
        "Escalation-to-human path"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/04/pendant-des-milliers-d-annees-le-cerveau-humain-a-appris-a-detecter-des-anomal"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Divulgation de l’interaction synthétique",
          "question": "Une personne peut-elle identifier de manière fiable qu’elle interagit avec un agent automatisé et comprendre les limites de cette interaction?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Trasparenza dell’interazione sintetica",
          "question": "Una persona può riconoscere in modo affidabile che sta interagendo con un agente automatizzato e comprenderne i limiti?"
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "COG-24",
      "domain": "social",
      "title": "Relational escalation",
      "criticality": "critical",
      "question": "Do sensitive or emotionally consequential interactions have criteria for transfer from automation to a qualified human?",
      "evidence": [
        "Escalation criteria",
        "Sensitive-case test",
        "Qualified-human handoff record"
      ],
      "corpus_evidence": [
        "https://voce.life/archive/2026/07/11/il-suffit-parfois-d-une-seule-conversation-interrompue"
      ],
      "i18n": {
        "fr": {
          "title": "Escalade relationnelle",
          "question": "Les interactions sensibles ou émotionnellement conséquentes disposent-elles de critères de transfert de l’automatisation vers un humain qualifié?"
        },
        "it": {
          "title": "Escalation relazionale",
          "question": "Le interazioni sensibili o con conseguenze emotive dispongono di criteri per trasferire il caso dall’automazione a una persona qualificata?"
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "review_triggers": [
    "Material interface redesign",
    "Change in alerting or escalation logic",
    "Change in human approval workload",
    "New autonomous action capability",
    "New memory or personalisation mechanism",
    "Change in staffing, shifts or supervision model",
    "Observed rise in errors, overrides, fatigue or missed alerts",
    "Introduction of synthetic social interaction in a sensitive context"
  ],
  "clinical_boundary": "The framework evaluates systems and workflows. It does not diagnose, screen, treat or profile an individual's mental health, cognitive disorder or neuropsychological condition."
}